Using copper sprays to control diseases in citrus

Introduction

Copper-based fungicides can be used to manage several fungal diseases that affect citrus fruit and foliage. Examples include citrus scab in high rainfall areas, Septoria spot (Figure 1) in drier inland regions and Phytophthora brown rot, which can strike whenever conditions are favourable. Copper can also be used to manage anthracnose. The anthracnose fungus is very common and can be a secondary invader of fruit damaged by other factors in the field, particularly in wet seasons. Anthracnose symptoms can also be seen postharvest on fruit that are over mature or held too long in storage.

Warm, humid conditions favour several citrus fungal diseases. In Australia most disease-management programs rely on copper sprays to protect the foliage and fruit from infection. Successful disease management depends on both even distribution and good retention of copper over all of the plant surfaces.

Figure 1 Septoria spot is a fungal disease of southern inland areas that can be managed by protectant copper sprays

How copper works

Copper sprays are protectant fungicides that must be applied evenly to the plant or fruit surface before the disease develops to prevent infection. Copper is not a systemic chemical and cannot be carried internally through the plant to kill the pathogen; it only protects where it lands. Once the copper is applied it sticks and does not spread across the fruit or leaf surface.

As the fruit and foliage grow, the new tissue is not protected. Rain and wind also erode the copper coverage over time. Timing re-application depends on the diseases you want to manage, the copper formulation used and weather conditions. More frequent applications are needed during wet seasons, in orchards with overhead irrigation, or in higher rainfall regions. For low rainfall regions such as the Riverina and Sunraysia, one copper spray in autumn is generally sufficient.

In recent years, an increase in fruit blemish has been seen in the Riverina where weakened rind tissue is invaded by the anthracnose fungus (Figure 2). Wet seasons and foggy mornings have exacerbated these issues. Varieties that hang on the tree for longer (i.e. late navels and Valencia) have a greater chance of exposure to stresses such as frost. Follow up sprays might be needed to protect the fruit.

Tear staining on fruit where injured cells are invaded by the anthracnose fungus.

Copper is most effective on diseases that need free water to develop. When water is present on the plant’s surface (from rain, dew or irrigation), exudates from the plant form weak acids, lowering the pH of the surface water. As the pH drops, the solubility of the copper product increases, slowly dissolving to release a small and constant supply of copper ions. When fungal spores or bacteria come into contact with surface water containing these copper ions, the ions travel through the pathogens’ cell walls and disrupt cellular enzyme activity.

Copper sprays should be used in conjunction with other management practices to reduce disease problems in the orchard. Fungal spores linger in the tree canopy in dead wood so pruning to remove the dead wood reduces the number of fungal spores in the canopy, thereby reducing disease incidence when conditions are favourable for disease development.

Copper formulations

The five basic copper formulations available for disease management are copper oxychloride, copper hydroxide, tribasic copper sulfate (green and blue coppers), copper ammonium  complexes (a dark blue aqueous complex of copper and ammonia) and cuprous oxide (red copper). Table 1 lists some Australian copper formulations and their particle sizes.

In the past, most copper products were wettable powders and contained about 50% copper as the active ingredient. However, today’s formulations contain from 8% to 75% copper and application rates vary accordingly. Products are formulated as wettable powders, water-dispersible granules, liquid flowable suspensions or aqueous liquids.

Copper products may also contain small amounts of impurities. Some cheaper products may contain high levels of undesirable heavy metals such as arsenic, mercury, lead and cadmium. Make sure you use only good quality copper products.
Smaller particles resist dislodgement better because they are lighter and have a greater surface area relative to their weight. This increases the total force of adhesion. The high initial losses experienced from weathering arise from a rapid and complete loss of large particles, whereas the remaining copper residues consist of small particles.

Copper formulations with smaller particles enhance disease management through better coverage, better rain-fastness and improved longevity of the copper ions on the plant surface.

Table 1. Some Australian copper formulations and their particle sizes.

Active ingredientParticle size range (microns)
Copper hydroxide0.15 to 2.50
Copper oxychloride1.40
Tribasic copper sulfate0.70 to 3.00
Cuprous oxide1.00 to 1.44

* Liquid flowable suspension. Source: Company technical brochures.

Particle size and retention

Research has demonstrated that the efficacy of a copper fungicide is improved considerably by reducing the particle size. The smaller the particle size the greater the number of particles per gram and therefore the greater the fungicidal or bactericidal activity. Coverage is improved with smaller particles, and there is significantly more surface area per gram of product from which copper ions can be released in the presence of moisture (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Leaf coverage improves with smaller particles of copper fungicide.

The main factors influencing copper retention on plants are:

  • particle size, smaller particles stick better (Figure 4)
  • rainfall (which can either directly dislodge particles or solubilise them)
  • wind (large particles over 3 or 4 microns in diameter can be blown off plant surfaces)
  • physical dislodgement or dilution of particles due to plant surface growth (e.g. fruit expansion)
  • excessive spray application volumes resulting in run-off and/or stripping of copper from leaf and fruit surfaces.

Research has found that:

  • regardless of whether the product is a liquid, liquid flowable or dry formulation, there is little difference in the level of control per unit of metallic copper. The most important factor affecting product effectiveness is the particle size of the formulation and how well it sticks to the plant surface (i.e. its rain-fastness).
  • products with a smaller particle size tend to have better coverage, rain-fastness and longevity.
  • frequent applications of copper at lower rates are more effective than the same amount of copper applied in fewer applications.

Force required to dislodge particles of differing sizes from a leaf surface

Effect of water pH

Most copper products are formulated to be almost insoluble in water at pH 7.0. As the pH of water decreases, the solubility of the copper fungicides increases and more copper ions are released.

If the water or spray solution is too acidic (i.e. pH <6.5), excessive amounts of copper ions can be released, burning the plant tissue. Copper formulations that have high amounts of soluble copper can also be prone to releasing too many copper ions.
Copper formulations vary in their solubility. The most soluble formulations are less persistent (Figure 5). For example, copper hydroxide has fairly high solubility and activity but is not very persistent under wet coastal conditions.

Comparison of solubility and persistence of copper formulations.

Damage from copper sprays

Copper sprays can damage the tissue between the oil glands, causing dead (necrotic) spots to appear. This gives the fruit rind or leaves a speckled or ‘stippled’ appearance (Figure 6 and Figure 7). The spots appear similar to those caused by the disease melanose, but they are almost black and are often on the exposed surface of the fruit. Copper sprays may also darken existing blemishes, such as wind blemishes on fruit.

Copper damage to citrus leaves, causing leaf stippling.

Copper stippling on a lemon fruit.

Copper-based fungicides can typically be safely applied with low rates (< 0.5%) of horticultural mineral oil. However, research has shown that some tank mixes that include copper can damage citrus fruit. This hazard was found to be greater when high rates of oil were included in the mixture and applied at low spray volumes.

Some copper-based fungicides can cause a small reduction in plant vigour. This reduction is caused by too many copper ions passing into the leaf and/or by other impurities in the product. Copper salts such as copper chloride (an impurity) can be present in some brands of copper hydroxide and oxychloride if not completely oxidised during manufacturing. These levels can be as high as 2% in some low-quality copper formulations.

Copper chloride rapidly dissolves and could increase the number of copper ions to excessive levels. Other heavy metal impurities such as lead and cadmium have also been implicated in increased levels of blemish.

Low-quality copper formulations with high levels of impurities may reduce plant growth and cause fruit blemish. Make sure you use a good-quality copper formulation.

The timing and frequency and rate of application are also very important, particularly with spring and summer applications.
It is important to apply copper with water volumes that give good coverage but do not cause excessive run-off (Figure 8). Excess spray droplets will run to the lowest point and either run off, leaving unprotected strips on the fruit surface, or dry, leaving copper residues. These concentrated copper residues can burn plant tissue (Figure 9).

Copper can also accumulate in some soils, causing damage to citrus roots and soil microorganisms, and it can interfere with the uptake of other plant nutrients.

Both citrus leaves and fruit are sometimes difficult to wet, as the leaves are waxy and the fruit is round, with a thick waxy cuticle. Adding a non-ionic wetter will help improve product retention. Always follow the product label recommendations.

Copper-based fungicides may be applied with a range of fungicides and insecticides. Check product labels for the manufacturers’ guidelines before mixing and application.

Copper-induced phytotoxicity is more common when:

  • copper is applied with products that make the tank mix acidic
  • copper is applied at high temperatures (> 30 °C)
  • copper is applied at high rates for three or four successive applications
  • copper is applied to wet, turgid fruit and the drying conditions are slow (e.g. early morning before the dew has lifted, or immediately after rain)
  • the drying conditions are cool and slow, or the humidity is high and the cloud cover is close to zero
  • certain aqueous liquid formulations (i.e. copper and ammonia complexes) are used
  • copper is mixed with high rates (> 0.5%) of horticultural mineral oil.

Excessive water rates result in spray runoff, wasting spray and contaminating soils. Source: Citrus Research International. Fruit stippling damage caused by excessive copper residues or the release of excessive amounts of copper ions.

Best-practice tips

  • Copper sprays are protectant fungicides and need to be applied before disease infection
  • Apply the correct water volume to achieve a good, even coverage of copper to the plant and fruit surfaces
  • The protective layer of copper diminishes over time and offers only short-term protection under certain conditions (i.e. in wet or humid climates or where overhead irrigation is used). If the infection is likely over longer periods, re-application may be necessary
  • Smaller particle size results in better rain-fastness and retention of the copper product
  • Apply copper sprays only as per the manufacturers’ recommendations
  • The pH of the water used to apply copper should be > 6.5
  • Frequent applications using low rates of copper are just as effective, and less toxic to plants than infrequent applications at high rates
  • Do not over-apply copper
  • Do not apply copper when fruit or leaf temperatures are high, humidity is high or the fruit is wet.

References

  • Albrigo LG, Timmer LW, Townsend K and Beck HW. 1997. Copper fungicides – residues for disease control and potential for spray burn. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 110: 67–70.
  • Brodrick HT. 1970. Accentuation of blemish marks by copper fungicide sprays. South Africa Citrus Journal, 441: 27–29.
  • Melpat International Pty Ltd, Technical notes. Retrieved from www.melpat.com.au/technical_notes.html
    Rae DJ, Beattie GA, Watson DM, Liu ZM and Jiang L. 1996. Effects of petroleum spray oils without and with copper fungicides on the control of citrus leaf miner, Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Australian Journal of Entomology, 35(3): 247–51.
  • Schutte GC. 1997. Rind stippling on Valencia oranges by copper fungicides used for control of citrus black spot in South Africa. Plant Diseases, 81(8): 851–854.
  • Timmer LW and Zitko SE. 1996. Evaluation of copper fungicides and rates of metallic copper for control of Melanose on grapefruit in Florida. Plant Diseases, 80(2): 166–169.

Acknowledgements

Andrew Creek, Citrus Development Officer, NSW DPI
Nerida Donovan, Citrus Pathologist, NSW DPI
Hamish Turner, Director/Technical & Product Development, Melpat International
Sandra Hardy, Former Leader Citrus, NSW DPI
Keith Fallow, Yara

March 2021.